The summary for Lancy ch 1-6 is located at the following link or in our Dropbox under Lancy.
Question 1: The research investigator conducting a qualitative study can serve as an interviewer or?
See: Pg. 11, Chapter 1
Question/Activity 2 and 3: Fill in the “Double Bubble Thinking Map” below to compare/contrast qualitative and quantitative analyses. Which approach leads to more detailed and valid data? Why?
Question 5: How are sociological tenets or beliefs different or the same as anthropological tenets or beliefs in America’s schools?
Question 6: What is wrong with the rough and tumble methodology?
Question 7: Case studies allow investigators to generalize, but not “overgeneralize.” Why is this so?
Question 8: What can we learn by collecting the personal accounts of teachers who have taught within the last 50 years? Would this info help reform educational policies?